Browse

Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS Macro HSM vs Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS Macro HSM is faster by 0.4 stops (f/3.5 vs f/4.0), letting in more light.
  • Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS Macro HSM goes wider (18mm vs 75mm).
  • Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III reaches further (300mm vs 250mm).
Specification comparison
Spec 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS Macro HSM EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III
Brand Sigma Canon
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Macro Telephoto Zoom
Focal length 18-250mm (wider) 75-300mm
Max aperture f/3.5 (faster) f/4.0
Released n/a 1999
Blades n/a 7
Format n/a full-frame
Groups n/a 9
Elements n/a 13
Weight g n/a 480.0
Filter mm n/a 58
Length mm n/a 122.1
Diameter mm n/a 71.0
Min focus m n/a 1.5
Max magnification n/a 0.25

Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS Macro HSM

This 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 APS-C macro zoom lens from Sigma fits Canon EF mount cameras, with Optical Stabilizer and Hyper Sonic Motor autofocus. A high-ratio walk-around zoom for APS-C cameras.

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III

An entry-level telephoto zoom with no stabilization and a basic micro motor instead of USM. Covers full frame.

Pros

  • Light
  • Long reach
  • Simple to use

Cons

  • No image stabilization
  • Soft at 300mm
  • Slow, noisy AF

More comparisons for Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS Macro HSM

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.