Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G ED AF-S vs Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport
Both are Nikon F lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G ED AF-S if
- You want a wider view: 24mm vs 70mm at the wide end
- You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 0.38 m vs 1.2 m
- You want a compact lens: 133 mm vs 202.9 mm long
Pick the Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport if
- You need more reach: 200mm vs 70mm at the long end
- You shoot handheld in dim light or video: it has optical image stabilization and the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G ED AF-S does not
- You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 11 aperture blades vs 9
- Our notes say it suits: Sports and events, portraits at distance, concert and stage work
Spec differences
14 differences| Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G ED AF-S | Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
Nikon
|
Sigma
|
| Type |
Zoom
|
Telephoto Zoom
|
| Focal length |
24-70mm
|
70-200mm
|
| Weight |
900 g
|
not listed
|
| Length |
133 mm
shorter
|
202.9 mm
|
| Diameter |
83 mm
slimmer
|
94.2 mm
|
| Filter thread |
77 mm
|
82 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
0.38 m
closer
|
1.2 m
|
| Max magnification |
not listed
|
0.21×
|
| Aperture blades |
9
|
11
more blades
|
| Optical design |
15 elements / 11 groups
|
24 elements / 22 groups
|
| Autofocus motor |
SWM
|
HSM
|
| Image stabilization |
No
|
Yes
stabilized
|
| Released |
2007
|
not listed
|
3 identical specs hidden: mount, format, max aperture. Show all
- Mount
- Nikon F both
- Format
- Full frame both
- Max aperture
- f/2.8 both
Our notes
Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G ED AF-S
This 24-70mm f/2.8 fast standard zoom lens from Nikon fits Nikon F mount cameras, with Silent Wave Motor autofocus and extra-low dispersion glass. The range covers everything from wide scenes to portraits, so it works as a general-purpose lens.
Our notes
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport
Sigma's stabilized 70-200mm f/2.8 Sport telephoto zoom for full-frame DSLRs, with an 11-bladed aperture and a minimum focus distance of 1.2 m. It takes 82mm filters.
Pros
- Constant f/2.8 aperture
- Optical stabilization
- 11-bladed aperture
- Weather resistant Sport design
Cons
- Heavy for a 70-200mm
- Large, so tiring for long handheld sessions
More comparisons
Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G ED AF-S vs Tamron SP 15-30mm F/2.8 Di VC USD
200 g lighter vs wider (15mm)
Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G ED AF-S vs Tamron SP AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR Di II LD Aspherical (IF)
more reach (70mm) vs wider (17mm)
Nikon AF-S 70-200mm f/2.8 G IF-ED VR vs Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport
Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport: focuses closer, sports and events
Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G ED AF-S vs Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC MACRO OS HSM Contemporary
covers full frame vs wider (17mm)
Tamron SP AF 70-200mm F/2.8 Di LD (IF) MACRO vs Sigma 70-200mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport
focuses closer vs stabilized
Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G ED AF-S vs Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM
covers full frame vs wider (17mm)