Skip to content
Menu

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6 vs Meike 6-11mm f/3.5

Both are Micro Four Thirds wide zoom lenses. Here is what actually differs.

Pick the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6 if

  • You need more reach: 18mm vs 11mm at the long end
  • Our notes say it suits: Landscapes and architecture, travel light, interiors

Pick the Meike 6-11mm f/3.5 if

  • You need ⅓ stop more light for low light or background blur (f/3.5 vs f/4)
  • You want a wider view: 6mm vs 9mm at the wide end

Spec differences

11 differences
Specifications that differ between the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6 and the Meike 6-11mm f/3.5
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6 Meike 6-11mm f/3.5
Brand
Olympus
Meike
Focal length
9-18mm
6-11mm
Max aperture
f/4
f/3.5 ⅓ stop faster
Weight
155 g
not listed
Length
50 mm
not listed
Diameter
56.5 mm
not listed
Filter thread
52 mm
not listed
Min focus distance
0.25 m
not listed
Max magnification
0.1×
not listed
Optical design
12 elements / 8 groups
11 elements / 8 groups
Autofocus motor
not listed
Manual focus
3 identical specs hidden: mount, type, image stabilization. Show all
Mount
Micro Four Thirds both
Type
Wide Zoom both
Image stabilization
No both

Our notes

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 9-18mm F4.0-5.6

A tiny, collapsible 18-36mm-equivalent wide zoom for Micro Four Thirds, weighing about 155 g. It focuses as close as 0.25 m.

Pros

  • Tiny and light at about 155 g
  • Collapsible when not in use
  • Close focus 0.25 m
  • Takes 52mm filters

Cons

  • Variable aperture
  • Not weather sealed

Our notes

Meike 6-11mm f/3.5

More comparisons

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.