Browse

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ vs Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO is faster by 0.6 stops (f/2.8 vs f/3.5), letting in more light.
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ is lighter by 669g.
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ goes wider (12mm vs 40mm).
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO reaches further (150mm vs 50mm).
Specification comparison
Spec M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO
Brand Olympus Olympus
Mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Type Zoom Zoom
Focal length 12-50mm (wider) 40-150mm
Max aperture f/3.5 f/2.8 (faster)
Weight g 211 (lighter) 880
Filter mm 52 72
Length mm 83.0 160.0
Diameter mm 57.0 79.0
Min focus m 0.2 (closer focusing) 0.7

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ

A weather-resistant power-zoom lens for Micro Four Thirds with a macro mode. It weighs about 211 g, takes 52mm filters and covers 24-100mm in full-frame terms.

Pros

  • Dust and splash resistant
  • Electronic zoom lever
  • Macro mode
  • Light at 211 g

Cons

  • Slow aperture
  • Image quality below Pro lenses
  • Electronic zoom speed is coarse

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 40-150mm f/2.8 PRO

A weather-sealed 80-300mm-equivalent telephoto zoom for Micro Four Thirds with a constant f/2.8 aperture. It weighs about 880 g, takes 72mm filters and supports Olympus teleconverters.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8
  • Weather-sealed build
  • Teleconverter support
  • Manual-focus clutch

Cons

  • Not stabilized itself
  • Heavier than other MFT lenses

More comparisons for Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.