Browse

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ vs Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro is faster by 0.6 stops (f/2.8 vs f/3.5), letting in more light.
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro is lighter by 25g.
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ goes wider (12mm vs 60mm).
  • Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro reaches further (60mm vs 50mm).
Specification comparison
Spec M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro
Brand Olympus Olympus
Mount Micro Four Thirds Micro Four Thirds
Type Zoom Macro
Focal length 12-50mm (wider) 60mm
Max aperture f/3.5 f/2.8 (faster)
Weight g 211 186 (lighter)
Filter mm 52 46
Length mm 83.0 82.0
Diameter mm 57.0 56.0
Min focus m 0.2 0.19 (closer focusing)

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ

A weather-resistant power-zoom lens for Micro Four Thirds with a macro mode. It weighs about 211 g, takes 52mm filters and covers 24-100mm in full-frame terms.

Pros

  • Dust and splash resistant
  • Electronic zoom lever
  • Macro mode
  • Light at 211 g

Cons

  • Slow aperture
  • Image quality below Pro lenses
  • Electronic zoom speed is coarse

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro

A 1:1 macro for Micro Four Thirds that is equivalent to a 120mm lens on full frame. It weighs about 186 g, takes 46mm filters and is dust and splash resistant.

Pros

  • True 1:1 magnification
  • Splash and dust resistant
  • Light at about 186 g
  • Focus limiter switch

Cons

  • No built-in stabilization
  • f/2.8 aperture

More comparisons for Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-50mm 1:3.5-6.3 EZ

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.