Skip to content
Menu

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm f/1.8 vs ED 17mm F1.2 PRO

Both are Micro Four Thirds prime lenses. Here is what actually differs.

Pick the 17mm f/1.8 if

  • You want the lighter lens to carry: 270 g lighter (120 g vs 390 g)
  • You want a compact lens: 36 mm vs 87 mm long
  • Our notes say it suits: Street photography, travel and documentary, everyday carry

Pick the ED 17mm F1.2 PRO if

  • You need 1⅓ stops more light for low light or background blur (f/1.2 vs f/1.8)
  • You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 0.2 m vs 0.25 m
  • You want bigger close-ups: 0.15× vs 0.08× maximum magnification

Spec differences

9 differences
Specifications that differ between the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm f/1.8 and the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO
17mm f/1.8 ED 17mm F1.2 PRO
Max aperture
f/1.8
f/1.2 1⅓ stops faster
Weight
120 g lighter
390 g
Length
36 mm shorter
87 mm
Diameter
58 mm slimmer
68.2 mm
Filter thread
46 mm
62 mm
Min focus distance
0.25 m
0.2 m closer
Max magnification
0.08×
0.15× larger
Optical design
9 elements / 6 groups
15 elements / 11 groups
Released
not listed
2017
5 identical specs hidden: brand, mount, type, focal length, image stabilization. Show all
Brand
Olympus both
Mount
Micro Four Thirds both
Type
Prime both
Focal length
17mm both
Image stabilization
No both

Our notes

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital 17mm f/1.8

A fast 34mm-equivalent prime for Micro Four Thirds with a metal body and a snap-focus clutch ring. It weighs about 120 g and takes 46mm filters.

Pros

  • f/1.8
  • Compact at about 120 g
  • Snap-focus clutch
  • Metal build

Cons

  • Not weather sealed
  • Autofocus is slower than newer Olympus primes

Our notes

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 17mm F1.2 PRO

More comparisons

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.