Skip to content
Menu

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro vs Meike 60mm f/2.8 Macro

Both are Micro Four Thirds macro lenses. Here is what actually differs.

Pick the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro if

  • You want the lighter lens to carry: 114 g lighter (186 g vs 300 g)
  • Our notes say it suits: Insects and flowers, product close-ups, detail portraits

Pick the Meike 60mm f/2.8 Macro if

Our spec data shows no clear advantage for this lens.

Spec differences

11 differences
Specifications that differ between the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro and the Meike 60mm f/2.8 Macro
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro Meike 60mm f/2.8 Macro
Brand
Olympus
Meike
Weight
186 g lighter
300 g
Length
82 mm
not listed
Diameter
56 mm
not listed
Filter thread
46 mm
49 mm
Min focus distance
0.19 m
not listed
Max magnification
1×
not listed
Aperture blades
not listed
9
Optical design
13 elements / 10 groups
11 elements / 8 groups
Autofocus motor
not listed
Manual focus
Weather sealing
Yes
not listed
5 identical specs hidden: mount, type, focal length, max aperture, image stabilization. Show all
Mount
Micro Four Thirds both
Type
Macro both
Focal length
60mm both
Max aperture
f/2.8 both
Image stabilization
No both

Our notes

Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 60mm F2.8 Macro

A 1:1 macro for Micro Four Thirds that is equivalent to a 120mm lens on full frame. It weighs about 186 g, takes 46mm filters and is dust and splash resistant.

Pros

  • True 1:1 magnification
  • Splash and dust resistant
  • Light at about 186 g
  • Focus limiter switch

Cons

  • No built-in stabilization
  • f/2.8 aperture

Our notes

Meike 60mm f/2.8 Macro

More comparisons

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.