Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM vs Sigma 200-500mm f/2.8 APO
Both are Canon EF telephoto zoom lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM if
- You want a wider view: 70mm vs 200mm at the wide end
- You shoot handheld in dim light or video: it has optical image stabilization and the Sigma 200-500mm f/2.8 APO does not
- You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 1.2 m vs 5 m
- You want bigger close-ups: 0.21× vs 0.13× maximum magnification
- Our notes say it suits: Sports and action, weddings, concerts and events
Pick the Sigma 200-500mm f/2.8 APO if
- You need more reach: 500mm vs 200mm at the long end
- You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 9 aperture blades vs 8
Spec differences
13 differences| Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM | Sigma 200-500mm f/2.8 APO | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
Canon
|
Sigma
|
| Focal length |
70-200mm
|
200-500mm
|
| Weight |
1480 g
|
not listed
|
| Length |
199 mm
|
not listed
|
| Diameter |
88.8 mm
|
not listed
|
| Filter thread |
77 mm
|
not listed
|
| Min focus distance |
1.2 m
closer
|
5 m
|
| Max magnification |
0.21×
larger
|
0.13×
|
| Aperture blades |
8
|
9
more blades
|
| Optical design |
23 elements / 19 groups
|
17 elements / 13 groups
|
| Autofocus motor |
USM
|
not listed
|
| Image stabilization |
Yes
stabilized
|
No
|
| Released |
2018
|
not listed
|
4 identical specs hidden: mount, type, format, max aperture. Show all
- Mount
- Canon EF both
- Type
- Telephoto Zoom both
- Format
- Full frame both
- Max aperture
- f/2.8 both
Our notes
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM
The third version of Canon's pro 70-200mm f/2.8 telephoto zoom, with image stabilization and a weather-sealed L build for sports, weddings and events.
Pros
- Constant f/2.8 aperture
- Image stabilization
- Weather-sealed L build
- Fast ring USM autofocus
Cons
- Heavy to carry all day
- Large front element shows fingerprints and dust
- Only a modest step over the II
Our notes
Sigma 200-500mm f/2.8 APO
More comparisons
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM vs Tamron SP AF 24-70mm F/2.8 Di VC USD
more reach (200mm) vs 655 g lighter
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM vs Tamron SP 70-200mm F/2.8 Di VC USD
0.21× magnification vs focuses closer
Tamron SP 70-200mm F/2.8 Di VC USD vs Sigma 200-500mm f/2.8 APO
wider (70mm) vs more reach (500mm)
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM vs Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM
more reach (200mm) vs wider (17mm)
Tamron SP AF 70-200mm F/2.8 Di LD (IF) MACRO vs Sigma 200-500mm f/2.8 APO
wider (70mm) vs more reach (500mm)
Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM vs Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Art
more reach (200mm) vs wider (24mm)