Browse

Sony 70-200mm F2.8 G SSM II vs Minolta AF 70-210mm f/4 (Beercan)

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Sony 70-200mm F2.8 G SSM II is faster by 1 stop (f/2.8 vs f/4.0), letting in more light.
  • Minolta AF 70-210mm f/4 (Beercan) is lighter by 605g.
  • Minolta AF 70-210mm f/4 (Beercan) reaches further (210mm vs 200mm).
  • Sony 70-200mm F2.8 G SSM II is the newer design (2013 vs 1985).
Specification comparison
Spec 70-200mm F2.8 G SSM II AF 70-210mm f/4 (Beercan)
Brand Sony Minolta
Mount Sony A Sony A
Type Telephoto Zoom Telephoto Zoom
Focal length 70-200mm 70-210mm
Max aperture f/2.8 (faster) f/4.0
Released 2013 1985
Blades 9 7
Format full-frame full-frame
Groups 16 9
Af motor SSM screw-drive
Elements 19 12
Weight g 1300 695 (lighter)
Filter mm 77 55
Length mm 196.6 152.0
Min focus m 1.2 1.1 (closer focusing)
Weather sealed Yes n/a
Max magnification 0.21 0.25

Sony 70-200mm F2.8 G SSM II

Sony's second 70-200mm f/2.8 G SSM for A-mount, with a dust and moisture resistant build and a ring-type SSM motor. It weighs about 1,300 g and takes 77mm filters.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8 aperture
  • SSM autofocus
  • Dust and moisture resistant
  • Wide focus-ring control with SSM manual override

Cons

  • Weighs about 1,300 g
  • No in-lens stabilization

Minolta AF 70-210mm f/4 (Beercan)

A constant f/4 telephoto zoom nicknamed the Beercan for its shape. It weighs about 695 g and takes 55mm filters.

Pros

  • Constant f/4
  • Sharp for its age
  • Compact for a 70-210mm
  • 55mm filters

Cons

  • Screw-drive AF
  • No stabilization

More comparisons for Sony 70-200mm F2.8 G SSM II

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.