Browse

Sony 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G SSM II vs Minolta AF 70-210mm f/4 (Beercan)

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Minolta AF 70-210mm f/4 (Beercan) is faster by 0.3 stops (f/4.0 vs f/4.5), letting in more light.
  • Minolta AF 70-210mm f/4 (Beercan) is lighter by 55g.
  • Sony 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G SSM II reaches further (300mm vs 210mm).
  • Sony 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G SSM II is the newer design (2015 vs 1985).
Specification comparison
Spec 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G SSM II AF 70-210mm f/4 (Beercan)
Brand Sony Minolta
Mount Sony A Sony A
Type Telephoto Zoom Telephoto Zoom
Focal length 70-300mm 70-210mm
Max aperture f/4.5 f/4.0 (faster)
Released 2015 1985
Blades 9 7
Format full-frame full-frame
Groups 11 9
Af motor SSM screw-drive
Elements 16 12
Weight g 750 695 (lighter)
Filter mm 62 55
Length mm 135.0 152.0
Min focus m 1.2 1.1 (closer focusing)
Weather sealed Yes n/a
Max magnification 0.25 0.25

Sony 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G SSM II

A 70-300mm G telephoto zoom for A-mount with SSM autofocus and a dust and moisture resistant build. It weighs about 750 g and takes 62mm filters.

Pros

  • Quick SSM autofocus
  • Full-frame coverage
  • Dust and moisture resistant
  • Close focus of 1.2 m

Cons

  • Slow at the long end
  • No stabilization (camera-based)
  • Weighs about 750 g

Minolta AF 70-210mm f/4 (Beercan)

A constant f/4 telephoto zoom nicknamed the Beercan for its shape. It weighs about 695 g and takes 55mm filters.

Pros

  • Constant f/4
  • Sharp for its age
  • Compact for a 70-210mm
  • 55mm filters

Cons

  • Screw-drive AF
  • No stabilization

More comparisons for Sony 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G SSM II

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.