Browse

Sony 300mm F2.8 G SSM II vs Minolta AF 135mm f/2.8 [T4.5] STF

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Minolta AF 135mm f/2.8 [T4.5] STF is lighter by 1610g.
  • Minolta AF 135mm f/2.8 [T4.5] STF goes wider (135mm vs 300mm).
  • Sony 300mm F2.8 G SSM II reaches further (300mm vs 135mm).
  • Sony 300mm F2.8 G SSM II is the newer design (2012 vs 1999).
Specification comparison
Spec 300mm F2.8 G SSM II AF 135mm f/2.8 [T4.5] STF
Brand Sony Minolta
Mount Sony A Sony A
Type Prime Telephoto
Focal length 300mm 135mm (wider)
Max aperture f/2.8 f/2.8
Released 2012 1999
Blades 9 n/a
Format full-frame full-frame
Groups 12 6
Af motor SSM none
Elements 13 8
Weight g 2340 730 (lighter)
Length mm 242.5 99.0
Min focus m 2.0 0.87 (closer focusing)
Weather sealed Yes n/a
Max magnification 0.18 0.25
Filter mm n/a 72

Sony 300mm F2.8 G SSM II

A 300mm f/2.8 telephoto for A-mount, built for sports and wildlife with SSM focusing and a dust and moisture resistant barrel. It weighs about 2,340 g.

Pros

  • f/2.8 maximum aperture
  • SSM autofocus
  • Dust and moisture resistant
  • Quick, quiet focus

Cons

  • Very heavy at about 2,340 g
  • Large and tiring to carry
  • No in-lens stabilization

Minolta AF 135mm f/2.8 [T4.5] STF

A manual-focus 135mm lens with an apodization element for exceptionally smooth out-of-focus areas. It weighs about 730 g and has a T4.5 transmission at f/2.8.

Pros

  • Apodization for smooth blur
  • Distinctive rendering
  • 72mm filters
  • Sharp

Cons

  • Manual focus only
  • Light loss (T4.5)

More comparisons for Sony 300mm F2.8 G SSM II

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.