Brightin Star 12mm f/2 III vs Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm F2
Both are Micro Four Thirds prime lenses. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the Brightin Star 12mm f/2 III if
Our spec data shows no clear advantage for this lens.
Pick the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm F2 if
- You want the lighter lens to carry: 138 g lighter (130 g vs 268 g)
Spec differences
10 differences| Brightin Star 12mm f/2 III | Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm F2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
Brightin Star
|
Olympus
|
| Weight |
268 g
|
130 g
lighter
|
| Length |
not listed
|
43 mm
|
| Diameter |
not listed
|
56 mm
|
| Filter thread |
not listed
|
46 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
not listed
|
0.2 m
|
| Max magnification |
not listed
|
0.08×
|
| Aperture blades |
10
|
not listed
|
| Optical design |
12 elements / 9 groups
|
11 elements / 8 groups
|
| Autofocus motor |
Manual focus
|
not listed
|
5 identical specs hidden: mount, type, focal length, max aperture, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Micro Four Thirds both
- Type
- Prime both
- Focal length
- 12mm both
- Max aperture
- f/2 both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
Rokinon 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS vs Brightin Star 12mm f/2 III
Rokinon 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS vs Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm F2
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm F2: 125 g lighter, shorter
Samyang 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS vs Brightin Star 12mm f/2 III
Samyang 12mm f/2.0 NCS CS vs Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm F2
Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12mm F2: 125 g lighter, shorter