Meike 25mm f/0.95 vs Laowa Argus 25mm f/0.95 CF APO
Both are Fujifilm X prime lenses for APS-C. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the Meike 25mm f/0.95 if
- You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 13 aperture blades vs 9
Pick the Laowa Argus 25mm f/0.95 CF APO if
Our spec data shows no clear advantage for this lens.
Spec differences
7 differences| Meike 25mm f/0.95 | Laowa Argus 25mm f/0.95 CF APO | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
Meike
|
Laowa
|
| Weight |
600 g
|
not listed
|
| Min focus distance |
not listed
|
0.34 m
|
| Max magnification |
not listed
|
0.15×
|
| Aperture blades |
13
more blades
|
9
|
| Optical design |
11 elements / 9 groups
|
14 elements / 9 groups
|
| Autofocus motor |
Manual focus
|
not listed
|
7 identical specs hidden: mount, type, format, focal length, max aperture, filter thread, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Fujifilm X both
- Type
- Prime both
- Format
- APS-C both
- Focal length
- 25mm both
- Max aperture
- f/0.95 both
- Filter thread
- 62 mm both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
Laowa 25mm f/2.8 2.5-5X Ultra Macro vs Meike 25mm f/0.95
covers full frame vs 3 stops faster
Meike 25mm f/1.8 vs Laowa Argus 25mm f/0.95 CF APO
focuses closer vs 2 stops faster
7artisans 25mm f/0.95 vs Meike 25mm f/0.95
7artisans 25mm f/0.95 vs Laowa Argus 25mm f/0.95 CF APO
7artisans 25mm f/0.95: focuses closer, more blades
Meike 25mm f/0.95 vs Viltrox AF 25mm f/1.7 Air
1⅔ stops faster vs 430 g lighter
Laowa Argus 25mm f/0.95 CF APO vs Viltrox AF 25mm f/1.7 Air
1⅔ stops faster vs focuses closer