Meike AF 35mm f/2 vs Laowa ACRIS 35mm f/2.8 1X Macro APO
Both are Leica L lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the Meike AF 35mm f/2 if
- You need 1 stop more light for low light or background blur (f/2 vs f/2.8)
Pick the Laowa ACRIS 35mm f/2.8 1X Macro APO if
Our spec data shows no clear advantage for this lens.
Spec differences
7 differences| Meike AF 35mm f/2 | Laowa ACRIS 35mm f/2.8 1X Macro APO | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
Meike
|
Laowa
|
| Type |
Prime
|
Macro
|
| Max aperture |
f/2
1 stop faster
|
f/2.8
|
| Filter thread |
not listed
|
72 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
not listed
|
0.18 m
|
| Optical design |
not listed
|
13 elements / 10 groups
|
| Autofocus motor |
STM
|
not listed
|
4 identical specs hidden: mount, format, focal length, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Leica L both
- Format
- Full frame both
- Focal length
- 35mm both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
Meike AF 35mm f/2 vs Sigma 35mm f/2 DG DN Contemporary
Laowa ACRIS 35mm f/2.8 1X Macro APO vs Sigma 35mm f/2 DG DN Contemporary
focuses closer vs 1 stop faster
Meke FF 35mm f/2.0 vs Meike AF 35mm f/2
Meke FF 35mm f/2.0 vs Laowa ACRIS 35mm f/2.8 1X Macro APO
Meke FF 35mm f/2.0: 1 stop faster
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Meike AF 35mm f/2
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Laowa ACRIS 35mm f/2.8 1X Macro APO
TTArtisan 35mm f/2: 1 stop faster