TTArtisan 17mm f/1.4 vs f/4 Tilt
Both are Canon RF lenses. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the f/1.4 if
- You need 3 stops more light for low light or background blur (f/1.4 vs f/4)
- You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 0.2 m vs 0.3 m
Pick the f/4 Tilt if
- You shoot full frame: the f/1.4 is made for APS-C
- You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 10 aperture blades vs 8
Spec differences
8 differences| f/1.4 | f/4 Tilt | |
|---|---|---|
| Type |
Prime
|
Tilt-Shift
|
| Format |
APS-C
|
Full frame
|
| Max aperture |
f/1.4
3 stops faster
|
f/4
|
| Weight |
248 g
|
not listed
|
| Filter thread |
40 mm
|
not listed
|
| Min focus distance |
0.2 m
closer
|
0.3 m
|
| Aperture blades |
8
|
10
more blades
|
| Optical design |
9 elements / 8 groups
|
17 elements / 11 groups
|
5 identical specs hidden: brand, mount, focal length, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Brand
- TTArtisan both
- Mount
- Canon RF both
- Focal length
- 17mm both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
Laowa 17mm f/4 Zero-D vs TTArtisan 17mm f/1.4
TTArtisan 17mm f/1.4: 3 stops faster
Laowa 17mm f/4 Zero-D vs TTArtisan 17mm f/4 Tilt
TTArtisan 17mm f/1.4 vs Laowa 17mm f/4 Zero-D Tilt-Shift
3 stops faster vs covers full frame
TTArtisan 17mm f/4 Tilt vs Laowa 17mm f/4 Zero-D Tilt-Shift
Laowa 17mm f/4 Zero-D Tilt-Shift: focuses closer, more blades