Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD vs Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM
Both are Canon EF telephoto zoom lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD if
- You need more reach: 300mm vs 200mm at the long end
- You want bigger close-ups: 0.25× vs 0.21× maximum magnification
- You want a compact lens: 142.7 mm vs 172 mm long
- You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 9 aperture blades vs 8
- You prefer a newer design: released 2010 vs 2006
Pick the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM if
- You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 1.2 m vs 1.5 m
- Our notes say it suits: Travel and landscape, hiking telephoto, outdoor sports
Spec differences
12 differences| Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD | Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
Tamron
|
Canon
|
| Focal length |
70-300mm
|
70-200mm
|
| Weight |
765 g
|
760 g
|
| Length |
142.7 mm
shorter
|
172 mm
|
| Diameter |
81.5 mm
|
76 mm
slimmer
|
| Filter thread |
62 mm
|
67 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
1.5 m
|
1.2 m
closer
|
| Max magnification |
0.25×
larger
|
0.21×
|
| Aperture blades |
9
more blades
|
8
|
| Optical design |
17 elements / 12 groups
|
20 elements / 15 groups
|
| Autofocus motor |
USD
|
USM
|
| Released |
2010
|
2006
|
5 identical specs hidden: mount, type, format, max aperture, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Canon EF both
- Type
- Telephoto Zoom both
- Format
- Full frame both
- Max aperture
- f/4 both
- Image stabilization
- Yes both
Our notes
Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD
A 70-300mm f/4-5.6 full-frame telephoto zoom lens, the Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD is designed for Canon EF mount bodies, from the Tamron SP series with Vibration Compensation. The range suits sports, wildlife, events and portraits.
Our notes
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM
A compact, light telephoto zoom with a constant f/4 aperture and stabilization. Popular with travel, landscape and wildlife photographers who watch their weight.
Pros
- Light and compact for the range
- Sharp optics
- Stabilized
- Dust and water resistant
Cons
- Slower than f/2.8 versions
- Blurred backgrounds are harder to achieve
More comparisons
Canon EF 70-300mm F4-5.6 IS USM vs Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD
135 g lighter vs more blades
Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro vs Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM
more reach (300mm) vs stabilized
Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD vs Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM
more reach (300mm) vs 95 g lighter
Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD vs Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS HSM Art
120 g lighter vs wider (24mm)
Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM vs Sigma 24-105mm f/4 DG OS HSM Art
125 g lighter vs wider (24mm)
Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD vs Sigma 18-250mm f/3.5-6.3 DC OS Macro HSM
more reach (300mm) vs ⅓ stop faster