Skip to content
Menu

Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD vs Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

Both are Canon EF telephoto zoom lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.

Pick the Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD if

  • You need more reach: 300mm vs 200mm at the long end
  • You want bigger close-ups: 0.25× vs 0.21× maximum magnification
  • You want a compact lens: 142.7 mm vs 172 mm long
  • You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 9 aperture blades vs 8
  • You prefer a newer design: released 2010 vs 2006

Pick the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM if

  • You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 1.2 m vs 1.5 m
  • Our notes say it suits: Travel and landscape, hiking telephoto, outdoor sports

Spec differences

12 differences
Specifications that differ between the Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD and the Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM
Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM
Brand
Tamron
Canon
Focal length
70-300mm
70-200mm
Weight
765 g
760 g
Length
142.7 mm shorter
172 mm
Diameter
81.5 mm
76 mm slimmer
Filter thread
62 mm
67 mm
Min focus distance
1.5 m
1.2 m closer
Max magnification
0.25× larger
0.21×
Aperture blades
9 more blades
8
Optical design
17 elements / 12 groups
20 elements / 15 groups
Autofocus motor
USD
USM
Released
2010
2006
5 identical specs hidden: mount, type, format, max aperture, image stabilization. Show all
Mount
Canon EF both
Type
Telephoto Zoom both
Format
Full frame both
Max aperture
f/4 both
Image stabilization
Yes both

Our notes

Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD

A 70-300mm f/4-5.6 full-frame telephoto zoom lens, the Tamron SP 70-300mm F4-5.6 Di VC USD is designed for Canon EF mount bodies, from the Tamron SP series with Vibration Compensation. The range suits sports, wildlife, events and portraits.

Our notes

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM

A compact, light telephoto zoom with a constant f/4 aperture and stabilization. Popular with travel, landscape and wildlife photographers who watch their weight.

Pros

  • Light and compact for the range
  • Sharp optics
  • Stabilized
  • Dust and water resistant

Cons

  • Slower than f/2.8 versions
  • Blurred backgrounds are harder to achieve

More comparisons

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.