Skip to content
Menu

Leica APO-Vario-Elmar-TL 55–135mm f/3.5–4.5 ASPH. vs Panasonic Lumix S Pro 70-200mm F4 O.I.S.

Both are Leica L lenses. Here is what actually differs.

Pick the Leica APO-Vario-Elmar-TL 55–135mm f/3.5–4.5 ASPH. if

  • You need ⅓ stop more light for low light or background blur (f/3.5 vs f/4)
  • You want the lighter lens to carry: 485 g lighter (500 g vs 985 g)
  • You want a wider view: 55mm vs 70mm at the wide end
  • You want a compact lens: 110 mm vs 179 mm long

Pick the Panasonic Lumix S Pro 70-200mm F4 O.I.S. if

  • You need more reach: 200mm vs 135mm at the long end
  • You shoot handheld in dim light or video: it has optical image stabilization and the Leica APO-Vario-Elmar-TL 55–135mm f/3.5–4.5 ASPH. does not
  • You shoot full frame: the Leica APO-Vario-Elmar-TL 55–135mm f/3.5–4.5 ASPH. is made for APS-C

Spec differences

14 differences
Specifications that differ between the Leica APO-Vario-Elmar-TL 55–135mm f/3.5–4.5 ASPH. and the Panasonic Lumix S Pro 70-200mm F4 O.I.S.
Leica APO-Vario-Elmar-TL 55–135mm f/3.5–4.5 ASPH. Panasonic Lumix S Pro 70-200mm F4 O.I.S.
Brand
Leica
Panasonic
Type
Zoom
Telephoto Zoom
Format
APS-C
Full frame
Focal length
55-135mm
70-200mm
Max aperture
f/3.5 ⅓ stop faster
f/4
Weight
500 g lighter
985 g
Length
110 mm shorter
179 mm
Diameter
68 mm slimmer
84.4 mm
Filter thread
60 mm
77 mm
Min focus distance
not listed
0.92 m
Max magnification
not listed
0.25×
Aperture blades
not listed
9
Optical design
12 elements / 10 groups
23 elements / 17 groups
Image stabilization
No
Yes stabilized
1 identical spec hidden: mount. Show all
Mount
Leica L both

More comparisons

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.