Skip to content
Menu

Leica Vario-Elmar-TL 18–56mm f/3.5–5.6 ASPH. vs Panasonic Lumix S 28-200mm F4-7.1 Macro O.I.S.

Both are Leica L lenses. Here is what actually differs.

Pick the Leica Vario-Elmar-TL 18–56mm f/3.5–5.6 ASPH. if

  • You need ⅓ stop more light for low light or background blur (f/3.5 vs f/4)
  • You want the lighter lens to carry: 157 g lighter (256 g vs 413 g)
  • You want a wider view: 18mm vs 28mm at the wide end
  • You want a compact lens: 60 mm vs 93.4 mm long

Pick the Panasonic Lumix S 28-200mm F4-7.1 Macro O.I.S. if

  • You need more reach: 200mm vs 56mm at the long end
  • You shoot handheld in dim light or video: it has optical image stabilization and the Leica Vario-Elmar-TL 18–56mm f/3.5–5.6 ASPH. does not
  • You want bigger close-ups: 0.5× vs 0.08× maximum magnification
  • You shoot full frame: the Leica Vario-Elmar-TL 18–56mm f/3.5–5.6 ASPH. is made for APS-C

Spec differences

15 differences
Specifications that differ between the Leica Vario-Elmar-TL 18–56mm f/3.5–5.6 ASPH. and the Panasonic Lumix S 28-200mm F4-7.1 Macro O.I.S.
Leica Vario-Elmar-TL 18–56mm f/3.5–5.6 ASPH. Panasonic Lumix S 28-200mm F4-7.1 Macro O.I.S.
Brand
Leica
Panasonic
Type
Zoom
Superzoom
Format
APS-C
Full frame
Focal length
18-56mm
28-200mm
Max aperture
f/3.5 ⅓ stop faster
f/4
Weight
256 g lighter
413 g
Length
60 mm shorter
93.4 mm
Diameter
63 mm slimmer
77.3 mm
Filter thread
52 mm
67 mm
Min focus distance
not listed
0.14 m
Max magnification
0.08×
0.5× larger
Aperture blades
not listed
9
Optical design
10 elements / 7 groups
17 elements / 13 groups
Image stabilization
No
Yes stabilized
Weather sealing
not listed
Yes
1 identical spec hidden: mount. Show all
Mount
Leica L both

More comparisons

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.