Leica Super-Vario-Elmarit-SL 14-24mm f/2.8 ASPH. vs Super-Vario-Elmar-SL 16-35mm f/3.5-4.5 ASPH.
Both are Leica L wide zoom lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the Super-Vario-Elmarit-SL 14-24mm f/2.8 ASPH. if
- You need ⅔ stop more light for low light or background blur (f/2.8 vs f/3.5)
- You want a wider view: 14mm vs 16mm at the wide end
Pick the Super-Vario-Elmar-SL 16-35mm f/3.5-4.5 ASPH. if
- You need more reach: 35mm vs 24mm at the long end
Spec differences
7 differences| Super-Vario-Elmarit-SL 14-24mm f/2.8 ASPH. | Super-Vario-Elmar-SL 16-35mm f/3.5-4.5 ASPH. | |
|---|---|---|
| Focal length |
14-24mm
|
16-35mm
|
| Max aperture |
f/2.8
⅔ stop faster
|
f/3.5
|
| Weight |
not listed
|
990 g
|
| Length |
not listed
|
123 mm
|
| Diameter |
not listed
|
88 mm
|
| Filter thread |
not listed
|
82 mm
|
| Optical design |
not listed
|
18 elements / 12 groups
|
5 identical specs hidden: brand, mount, type, format, image stabilization. Show all
- Brand
- Leica both
- Mount
- Leica L both
- Type
- Wide Zoom both
- Format
- Full frame both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN II | Art 024 vs Leica Super-Vario-Elmarit-SL 14-24mm f/2.8 ASPH.
more reach (70mm) vs wider (14mm)
Sigma 24-70mm F2.8 DG DN II | Art 024 vs Leica Super-Vario-Elmar-SL 16-35mm f/3.5-4.5 ASPH.
⅔ stop faster vs wider (16mm)
Panasonic Lumix S Pro 24-70mm F2.8 vs Leica Super-Vario-Elmarit-SL 14-24mm f/2.8 ASPH.
more reach (70mm) vs wider (14mm)
Leica Super-Vario-Elmar-SL 16-35mm f/3.5-4.5 ASPH. vs Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary
covers full frame vs 375 g lighter
Leica Super-Vario-Elmarit-SL 14-24mm f/2.8 ASPH. vs Laowa 8-15mm f/2.8 FF Zoom Fisheye
more reach (24mm) vs wider (8mm)
Leica Super-Vario-Elmar-SL 16-35mm f/3.5-4.5 ASPH. vs Panasonic Lumix S 20-60mm F3.5-5.6
wider (16mm) vs 640 g lighter