Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D vs Viltrox AF 14mm f/4 Air
Both are Sony E prime lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D if
Our spec data shows no clear advantage for this lens.
Pick the Viltrox AF 14mm f/4 Air if
- You want bigger close-ups: 0.23× vs 0.07× maximum magnification
- You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 7 aperture blades vs 5
Spec differences
10 differences| Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D | Viltrox AF 14mm f/4 Air | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
Laowa
|
Viltrox
|
| Weight |
not listed
|
170 g
|
| Length |
not listed
|
56.4 mm
|
| Diameter |
not listed
|
65 mm
|
| Filter thread |
not listed
|
58 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
not listed
|
0.13 m
|
| Max magnification |
0.07×
|
0.23×
larger
|
| Aperture blades |
5
|
7
more blades
|
| Optical design |
13 elements / 9 groups
|
12 elements / 9 groups
|
| Autofocus motor |
not listed
|
STM
|
6 identical specs hidden: mount, type, format, focal length, max aperture, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Sony E both
- Type
- Prime both
- Format
- Full frame both
- Focal length
- 14mm both
- Max aperture
- f/4 both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical vs Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D
Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical: 1 stop faster
Samyang 14mm f/2.8 IF ED UMC Aspherical vs Viltrox AF 14mm f/4 Air
1 stop faster vs 400 g lighter
Sony FE 14mm F1.8 GM vs Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D
Sony FE 14mm F1.8 GM: 2⅓ stops faster, 0.1× magnification
Sony FE 14mm F1.8 GM vs Viltrox AF 14mm f/4 Air
2⅓ stops faster vs 290 g lighter
TTArtisan AF 14mm f/3.5 vs Laowa 14mm f/4 FF RL Zero-D
⅓ stop faster vs covers full frame
TTArtisan AF 14mm f/3.5 vs Viltrox AF 14mm f/4 Air
⅓ stop faster vs focuses closer