Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 CF APO vs Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4
Both are Canon EF-M prime lenses for APS-C. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 CF APO if
- You need 1 stop more light for low light or background blur (f/0.95 vs f/1.4)
- You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 0.35 m vs 0.4 m
Pick the Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4 if
- You want autofocus (STM): the Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 CF APO is manual focus only
Spec differences
10 differences| Laowa Argus 33mm f/0.95 CF APO | Viltrox AF 33mm f/1.4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
Laowa
|
Viltrox
|
| Max aperture |
f/0.95
1 stop faster
|
f/1.4
|
| Weight |
not listed
|
270 g
|
| Length |
not listed
|
72 mm
|
| Diameter |
not listed
|
65 mm
|
| Filter thread |
62 mm
|
52 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
0.35 m
closer
|
0.4 m
|
| Max magnification |
not listed
|
0.1×
|
| Optical design |
14 elements / 9 groups
|
10 elements / 9 groups
|
| Autofocus motor |
Manual focus
|
STM
|
6 identical specs hidden: mount, type, format, focal length, aperture blades, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Canon EF-M both
- Type
- Prime both
- Format
- APS-C both
- Focal length
- 33mm both
- Aperture blades
- 9 both
- Image stabilization
- No both