Laowa 35mm f/2.8 Zero-D Tilt-Shift 0.5× Macro vs Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF
Both are Canon RF lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the 35mm f/2.8 Zero-D Tilt-Shift 0.5× Macro if
- You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 0.23 m vs 0.5 m
Pick the Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF if
- You need 3 stops more light for low light or background blur (f/0.95 vs f/2.8)
Spec differences
6 differences| 35mm f/2.8 Zero-D Tilt-Shift 0.5× Macro | Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF | |
|---|---|---|
| Type |
Tilt-Shift
|
Prime
|
| Max aperture |
f/2.8
|
f/0.95
3 stops faster
|
| Filter thread |
77 mm
|
72 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
0.23 m
closer
|
0.5 m
|
| Max magnification |
not listed
|
0.1×
|
| Optical design |
14 elements / 12 groups
|
14 elements / 9 groups
|
6 identical specs hidden: brand, mount, format, focal length, aperture blades, image stabilization. Show all
- Brand
- Laowa both
- Mount
- Canon RF both
- Format
- Full frame both
- Focal length
- 35mm both
- Aperture blades
- 15 both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
Canon RF 35mm F1.8 MACRO IS STM vs Laowa 35mm f/2.8 Zero-D Tilt-Shift 0.5× Macro
1⅓ stops faster vs more blades
Canon RF 35mm F1.4 L VCM vs Laowa Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF
focuses closer vs 1 stop faster
Canon RF 35mm F1.4 L VCM vs Laowa 35mm f/2.8 Zero-D Tilt-Shift 0.5× Macro
2 stops faster vs focuses closer
Canon RF 35mm F1.8 MACRO IS STM vs Laowa Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF
stabilized vs 2 stops faster
Viltrox 35mm f/1.7 vs Laowa 35mm f/2.8 Zero-D Tilt-Shift 0.5× Macro
1½ stops faster vs focuses closer
7artisans 35mm f/0.95 vs Laowa Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF
focuses closer vs covers full frame