Laowa 35mm f/2.8 Zero-D Tilt-Shift 0.5× Macro vs Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF
Both are Sony E lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the 35mm f/2.8 Zero-D Tilt-Shift 0.5× Macro if
- You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 0.23 m vs 0.5 m
Pick the Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF if
- You need 3 stops more light for low light or background blur (f/0.95 vs f/2.8)
Spec differences
6 differences| 35mm f/2.8 Zero-D Tilt-Shift 0.5× Macro | Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF | |
|---|---|---|
| Type |
Tilt-Shift
|
Prime
|
| Max aperture |
f/2.8
|
f/0.95
3 stops faster
|
| Filter thread |
77 mm
|
72 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
0.23 m
closer
|
0.5 m
|
| Max magnification |
not listed
|
0.1×
|
| Optical design |
14 elements / 12 groups
|
14 elements / 9 groups
|
6 identical specs hidden: brand, mount, format, focal length, aperture blades, image stabilization. Show all
- Brand
- Laowa both
- Mount
- Sony E both
- Format
- Full frame both
- Focal length
- 35mm both
- Aperture blades
- 15 both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
Tamron E 35mm F2.8 F053 vs Laowa 35mm f/2.8 Zero-D Tilt-Shift 0.5× Macro
focuses closer vs more blades
Sigma 35mm F1.2 DG DN | Art 019 vs Laowa Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF
focuses closer vs ⅔ stop faster
Sigma 35mm F2 DG DN | Contemporary 020 vs Laowa 35mm f/2.8 Zero-D Tilt-Shift 0.5× Macro
1 stop faster vs focuses closer
Sony FE 35mm F1.4 GM vs Laowa Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF
focuses closer vs 1 stop faster
Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS vs Laowa 35mm f/2.8 Zero-D Tilt-Shift 0.5× Macro
1⅓ stops faster vs focuses closer
Sony E 35mm F1.8 OSS vs Laowa Argus 35mm f/0.95 FF
stabilized vs 2 stops faster