Samyang 16mm T2.6 ED AS UMC vs AF 16mm f/2.8 P
Both are Sony E prime lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the 16mm T2.6 ED AS UMC if
Our spec data shows no clear advantage for this lens.
Pick the AF 16mm f/2.8 P if
- You want autofocus (Linear motor): the 16mm T2.6 ED AS UMC is manual focus only
- You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 0.12 m vs 0.3 m
- You want a compact lens: 70.5 mm vs 122.1 mm long
Spec differences
11 differences| 16mm T2.6 ED AS UMC | AF 16mm f/2.8 P | |
|---|---|---|
| Max aperture |
f/2.6
|
f/2.8
|
| Weight |
not listed
|
207 g
|
| Length |
122.1 mm
|
70.5 mm
shorter
|
| Diameter |
81.65 mm
|
69.8 mm
slimmer
|
| Filter thread |
not listed
|
62 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
0.3 m
|
0.12 m
closer
|
| Max magnification |
not listed
|
0.33×
|
| Aperture blades |
not listed
|
7
|
| Optical design |
14 elements / 11 groups
|
8 elements / 7 groups
|
| Autofocus motor |
Manual focus
|
Linear motor
|
| Weather sealing |
not listed
|
Yes
|
6 identical specs hidden: brand, mount, type, format, focal length, image stabilization. Show all
- Brand
- Samyang both
- Mount
- Sony E both
- Type
- Prime both
- Format
- Full frame both
- Focal length
- 16mm both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
Sony E 16mm F2.8 vs Samyang 16mm T2.6 ED AS UMC
focuses closer vs covers full frame
Sony E 16mm F2.8 vs Samyang AF 16mm f/2.8 P
140 g lighter vs focuses closer
Brightin Star 16mm f/2.8 vs Samyang 16mm T2.6 ED AS UMC
Brightin Star 16mm f/2.8 vs Samyang AF 16mm f/2.8 P
Samyang AF 16mm f/2.8 P: autofocus
Rokinon 16mm f/2.0 ED AS UMC CS vs Samyang 16mm T2.6 ED AS UMC
⅔ stop faster vs covers full frame
Meike 16mm f/3.5 Fisheye vs Samyang AF 16mm f/2.8 P
Samyang AF 16mm f/2.8 P: ⅔ stop faster