Browse

Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD vs Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR goes wider (16mm vs 18mm).
  • Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD reaches further (270mm vs 85mm).
Specification comparison
Spec 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR
Brand Tamron Nikon
Mount Nikon F Nikon F
Type Zoom Zoom
Focal length 18-270mm 16-85mm (wider)
Max aperture f/3.5 f/3.5
Released n/a 2008
Format aps-c aps-c
Af motor PZD SWM
Filter mm 62 67
Stabilized Yes Yes
Min focus m 0.49 0.38 (closer focusing)
Groups n/a 11
Elements n/a 17
Weight g n/a 485.0
Length mm n/a 85.0
Diameter mm n/a 72.0

Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD

Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD: an APS-C superzoom lens with a 18-270mm focal length and a maximum aperture of f/3.5-6.3, made for Nikon F mount cameras, with Vibration Compensation and quiet motor-driven autofocus. A high-ratio travel zoom covering wide-angle to telep...

Nikon AF-S DX Nikkor 16-85mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR

DX standard zoom with a 24-127mm equivalent range and VR, introduced in 2008. It sits above the 18-55mm kit zooms.

Pros

  • Wide 16mm end
  • VR
  • Better than kit lenses
  • Takes 67mm filters

Cons

  • Variable aperture
  • Distortion at the wide end

More comparisons for Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.