Browse

Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD vs Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD goes wider (18mm vs 24mm).
  • Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD reaches further (270mm vs 120mm).
Specification comparison
Spec 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED
Brand Tamron Nikon
Mount Nikon F Nikon F
Type Zoom Superzoom
Focal length 18-270mm (wider) 24-120mm
Max aperture f/3.5 f/3.5
Released n/a 2003
Format aps-c full-frame
Af motor PZD SWM
Filter mm 62 72
Stabilized Yes Yes
Min focus m 0.49 0.5
Groups n/a 13
Elements n/a 15
Weight g n/a 575.0
Length mm n/a 94.0
Diameter mm n/a 77.0

Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD

Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD: an APS-C superzoom lens with a 18-270mm focal length and a maximum aperture of f/3.5-6.3, made for Nikon F mount cameras, with Vibration Compensation and quiet motor-driven autofocus. A high-ratio travel zoom covering wide-angle to telep...

Nikon AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 24-120mm f/3.5-5.6G IF-ED

Nikon's FX zoom with VR and a 72mm filter thread, introduced in 2003. The 24-120mm f/4G ED VR succeeded it.

Pros

  • Wide range
  • VR
  • Silent Wave Motor
  • Lighter than its f/4 successor

Cons

  • Slow aperture
  • Soft at 120mm
  • Distortion at 24mm

More comparisons for Tamron 18-270mm F/3.5-6.3 Di II VC PZD

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.