Skip to content
Menu

Tokina AT-X 240 24-40mm f/2.8 vs 352 35-200mm f/3.5-4.5

Both are Contax/Yashica lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.

Pick the 240 24-40mm f/2.8 if

  • You need ⅔ stop more light for low light or background blur (f/2.8 vs f/3.5)
  • You want the lighter lens to carry: 170 g lighter (520 g vs 690 g)
  • You want a wider view: 24mm vs 35mm at the wide end
  • You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 0.4 m vs 1.6 m
  • You want a compact lens: 78 mm vs 123 mm long

Pick the 352 35-200mm f/3.5-4.5 if

  • You need more reach: 200mm vs 40mm at the long end

Spec differences

11 differences
Specifications that differ between the Tokina AT-X 240 24-40mm f/2.8 and the Tokina AT-X 352 35-200mm f/3.5-4.5
240 24-40mm f/2.8 352 35-200mm f/3.5-4.5
Type
Zoom
Superzoom
Focal length
24-40mm
35-200mm
Max aperture
f/2.8 ⅔ stop faster
f/3.5
Weight
520 g lighter
690 g
Length
78 mm shorter
123 mm
Diameter
76 mm
70 mm slimmer
Filter thread
72 mm
67 mm
Min focus distance
0.4 m closer
1.6 m
Max magnification
not listed
0.25×
Aperture blades
7 more blades
6
Optical design
17 elements / 13 groups
16 elements / 13 groups
5 identical specs hidden: brand, mount, format, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
Brand
Tokina both
Mount
Contax/Yashica both
Format
Full frame both
Autofocus motor
Manual focus both
Image stabilization
No both

More comparisons

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.