Tokina AT-X 352 35-200mm f/3.5-4.5 vs SZ 820 80-200mm f/4
Both are Canon FD lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the AT-X 352 35-200mm f/3.5-4.5 if
- You need ⅓ stop more light for low light or background blur (f/3.5 vs f/4)
- You want a wider view: 35mm vs 80mm at the wide end
- You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 1.6 m vs 1.9 m
Pick the SZ 820 80-200mm f/4 if
- You want the lighter lens to carry: 110 g lighter (580 g vs 690 g)
Spec differences
10 differences| AT-X 352 35-200mm f/3.5-4.5 | SZ 820 80-200mm f/4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Type |
Superzoom
|
Telephoto Zoom
|
| Focal length |
35-200mm
|
80-200mm
|
| Max aperture |
f/3.5
⅓ stop faster
|
f/4
|
| Weight |
690 g
|
580 g
lighter
|
| Length |
123 mm
shorter
|
132 mm
|
| Diameter |
70 mm
|
65 mm
slimmer
|
| Filter thread |
67 mm
|
55 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
1.6 m
closer
|
1.9 m
|
| Max magnification |
0.25×
|
not listed
|
| Optical design |
16 elements / 13 groups
|
12 elements / 9 groups
|
6 identical specs hidden: brand, mount, format, aperture blades, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Brand
- Tokina both
- Mount
- Canon FD both
- Format
- Full frame both
- Aperture blades
- 6 both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
Canon FD 35-105mm f/3.5 vs Tokina AT-X 352 35-200mm f/3.5-4.5
Tokina AT-X 352 35-200mm f/3.5-4.5: more reach (200mm)
Vivitar 75-205mm f/3.8 Auto Tele-Zoom vs Tokina SZ 820 80-200mm f/4
Vivitar 75-205mm f/3.8 Auto Tele-Zoom: wider (75mm), more reach (205mm)
Canon FD 35-70mm f/3.5-4.5 vs Tokina AT-X 352 35-200mm f/3.5-4.5
115 g lighter vs more reach (200mm)
Canon FD 35-105mm f/3.5 vs Tokina SZ 820 80-200mm f/4
⅓ stop faster vs more reach (200mm)
Vivitar 70-210mm f/3.5 Macro Focusing Zoom vs Tokina AT-X 352 35-200mm f/3.5-4.5
more reach (210mm) vs wider (35mm)
Canon New FD 35-105mm f/3.5 vs Tokina SZ 820 80-200mm f/4
⅓ stop faster vs more reach (200mm)