Tokina AT-X 828 80-200mm f/2.8 vs SZ 820 80-200mm f/4
Both are Minolta MD telephoto zoom lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the AT-X 828 80-200mm f/2.8 if
- You need 1 stop more light for low light or background blur (f/2.8 vs f/4)
Pick the SZ 820 80-200mm f/4 if
- You want the lighter lens to carry: 500 g lighter (580 g vs 1080 g)
- You want a compact lens: 132 mm vs 173 mm long
Spec differences
8 differences| AT-X 828 80-200mm f/2.8 | SZ 820 80-200mm f/4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Max aperture |
f/2.8
1 stop faster
|
f/4
|
| Weight |
1080 g
|
580 g
lighter
|
| Length |
173 mm
|
132 mm
shorter
|
| Diameter |
81 mm
|
65 mm
slimmer
|
| Filter thread |
77 mm
|
55 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
1.8 m
closer
|
1.9 m
|
| Max magnification |
0.13×
|
not listed
|
| Optical design |
17 elements / 11 groups
|
12 elements / 9 groups
|
8 identical specs hidden: brand, mount, type, format, focal length, aperture blades, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Brand
- Tokina both
- Mount
- Minolta MD both
- Type
- Telephoto Zoom both
- Format
- Full frame both
- Focal length
- 80-200mm both
- Aperture blades
- 6 both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
Vivitar Series 1 28-105mm f/2.8-3.8 VMC vs Tokina AT-X 828 80-200mm f/2.8
wider (28mm) vs more reach (200mm)
Vivitar 75-205mm f/3.8 Auto Tele-Zoom vs Tokina SZ 820 80-200mm f/4
Vivitar 75-205mm f/3.8 Auto Tele-Zoom: wider (75mm), more reach (205mm)
Vivitar 35-85mm f/2.8 Close Focus vs Tokina AT-X 828 80-200mm f/2.8
wider (35mm) vs more reach (200mm)
Vivitar 70-210mm f/3.5 Macro Focusing Zoom vs Tokina SZ 820 80-200mm f/4
Vivitar 70-210mm f/3.5 Macro Focusing Zoom: ⅓ stop faster, wider (70mm)
Tamron SP 35-80mm f/2.8-3.8 Adaptall-2 vs Tokina AT-X 828 80-200mm f/2.8
694 g lighter vs more reach (200mm)
Minolta MD Zoom 28-135mm f/4-4.5 vs Tokina SZ 820 80-200mm f/4
wider (28mm) vs more reach (200mm)