Skip to content
Menu

Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary vs Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD

Both are Nikon Z lenses. Here is what actually differs.

Pick the Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary if

  • You need ⅔ stop more light for low light or background blur (f/3.5 vs f/4.5)
  • You want a wider view: 16mm vs 70mm at the wide end
  • You shoot handheld in dim light or video: it has optical image stabilization and the Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD does not
  • You want bigger close-ups: 0.5× vs 0.2× maximum magnification
  • You want a compact lens: 125.4 mm vs 150.3 mm long

Pick the Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD if

  • You want the lighter lens to carry: 50 g lighter (580 g vs 630 g)
  • You shoot full frame: the Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary is made for APS-C

Spec differences

15 differences
Specifications that differ between the Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary and the Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD
Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 DC OS Contemporary Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD
Brand
Sigma
Tamron
Type
Superzoom
Telephoto Zoom
Format
APS-C
Full frame
Focal length
16-300mm
70-300mm
Max aperture
f/3.5 ⅔ stop faster
f/4.5
Weight
630 g
580 g lighter
Length
125.4 mm shorter
150.3 mm
Diameter
73.8 mm slimmer
77 mm
Min focus distance
not listed
0.8 m
Max magnification
0.5× larger
0.2×
Aperture blades
9 more blades
7
Optical design
20 elements / 14 groups
15 elements / 10 groups
Autofocus motor
Linear motor
RXD
Image stabilization
Yes stabilized
No
Released
2025
2022
3 identical specs hidden: mount, filter thread, weather sealing. Show all
Mount
Nikon Z both
Filter thread
67 mm both
Weather sealing
Yes both

More comparisons

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.