Browse

Tamron AF 28-300mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Macro vs Sony DT 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 SAM (SAL18135)

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Sony DT 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 SAM (SAL18135) goes wider (18mm vs 28mm).
  • Tamron AF 28-300mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Macro reaches further (300mm vs 135mm).
Specification comparison
Spec AF 28-300mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Macro DT 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 SAM (SAL18135)
Brand Tamron Sony
Mount Sony A Sony A
Type Zoom Superzoom
Focal length 28-300mm 18-135mm (wider)
Max aperture f/3.5 f/3.5
Released n/a 2012
Filter mm 62 62
Min focus m 0.49 0.45 (closer focusing)
Blades n/a 7
Format n/a aps-c
Groups n/a 11
Af motor n/a SAM
Elements n/a 14
Weight g n/a 398
Max magnification n/a 0.25

Tamron AF 28-300mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Macro

This 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 full-frame superzoom lens from Tamron fits Sony A mount cameras, with aspherical elements. A high-ratio travel zoom covering wide-angle to telephoto in one lens.

Sony DT 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 SAM (SAL18135)

A walk-around APS-C zoom for A-mount with 7.5x range. It weighs about 398 g and has a SAM motor and 62mm filter thread.

Pros

  • Wide 18-135mm range
  • SAM autofocus
  • Reasonable weight at about 398 g
  • Close focus of 0.45 m

Cons

  • Slow aperture at the long end
  • Not weather sealed
  • APS-C only

More comparisons for Tamron AF 28-300mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Macro

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.