Browse

Canon EF 135mm F2L USM vs Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Canon EF 135mm F2L USM is faster by 1 stop (f/2.0 vs f/2.8), letting in more light.
  • Canon EF 135mm F2L USM is lighter by 2090g.
  • Canon EF 135mm F2L USM goes wider (135mm vs 400mm).
  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM reaches further (400mm vs 135mm).
  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM is the newer design (2018 vs 1996).
Specification comparison
Spec EF 135mm F2L USM EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM
Brand Canon Canon
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Prime Telephoto
Focal length 135mm (wider) 400mm
Max aperture f/2.0 (faster) f/2.8
Released 1996 2018
Blades 8 9
Format full-frame full-frame
Groups 8 13
Af motor USM USM
Elements 10 17
Weight g 750.0 (lighter) 2840.0
Filter mm 72 n/a
Length mm 112.0 343.0
Diameter mm 82.5 163.0
Min focus m 0.9 (closer focusing) 2.5
Max magnification 0.19 0.17
Stabilized n/a Yes

Canon EF 135mm F2L USM

A fast 135mm telephoto prime, long known for sharpness and strong subject isolation. A favorite among Canon portrait and event photographers.

Pros

  • f/2 aperture
  • Very sharp
  • Fast focus
  • Pleasing background blur

Cons

  • No image stabilization
  • Long for tight spaces
  • Narrow focus margin at f/2

Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM

The third generation of Canon's 400mm f/2.8 supertelephoto, redesigned to be much lighter than the II. Image stabilization and fluorite elements.

Pros

  • About a kilogram lighter than the II
  • f/2.8 aperture
  • Stabilized
  • Fast AF

Cons

  • Still heavy at about 2.8 kg
  • Demands a monopod
  • Large

More comparisons for Canon EF 135mm F2L USM

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.