Voigtlander Nokton Classic 35mm F1.4 II vs Vintage Line 35mm F1.5 Aspherical
Both are Leica M prime lenses. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the Classic 35mm F1.4 II if
- You want a compact lens: 28.5 mm vs 36 mm long
Pick the Vintage Line 35mm F1.5 Aspherical if
- You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 0.5 m vs 0.7 m
- You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 12 aperture blades vs 10
Spec differences
8 differences| Classic 35mm F1.4 II | Vintage Line 35mm F1.5 Aspherical | |
|---|---|---|
| Max aperture |
f/1.4
|
f/1.5
|
| Weight |
189 g
|
188 g
|
| Length |
28.5 mm
shorter
|
36 mm
|
| Diameter |
55 mm
|
53 mm
slimmer
|
| Filter thread |
43 mm
|
39 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
0.7 m
|
0.5 m
closer
|
| Aperture blades |
10
|
12
more blades
|
| Optical design |
8 elements / 6 groups
|
9 elements / 6 groups
|
6 identical specs hidden: brand, mount, type, focal length, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Brand
- Voigtlander both
- Mount
- Leica M both
- Type
- Prime both
- Focal length
- 35mm both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM vs Voigtlander Nokton Classic 35mm F1.4 II
Voigtlander Nokton Classic 35mm F1.4 II: 192 g lighter, shorter
Zeiss Distagon T* 35mm f/1.4 ZM vs Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 35mm F1.5 Aspherical
Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 35mm F1.5 Aspherical: 193 g lighter, focuses closer
7artisans 35mm f/1.7 vs Voigtlander Nokton Classic 35mm F1.4 II
Voigtlander Nokton Classic 35mm F1.4 II: ½ stop faster
7artisans 35mm f/1.7 vs Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 35mm F1.5 Aspherical
Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 35mm F1.5 Aspherical: ⅓ stop faster
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Voigtlander Nokton Classic 35mm F1.4 II
Voigtlander Nokton Classic 35mm F1.4 II: 1 stop faster, 321 g lighter
TTArtisan 35mm f/2 vs Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 35mm F1.5 Aspherical
Voigtlander Nokton Vintage Line 35mm F1.5 Aspherical: ⅔ stop faster, 322 g lighter