Browse

Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L USM vs Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L USM is faster by 1.1 stops (f/11.0 vs f/16.0), letting in more light.
  • Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM is lighter by 565g.
  • Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L USM goes wider (11mm vs 16mm).
  • Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM reaches further (35mm vs 24mm).
  • Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L USM is the newer design (2015 vs 2014).
Specification comparison
Spec EF 11-24mm f/4L USM EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM
Brand Canon Canon
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Wide Zoom Wide Zoom
Focal length 11-24mm (wider) 16-35mm
Max aperture f/11.0 (faster) f/16.0
Released 2015 2014
Blades 9 9
Format full-frame full-frame
Groups 11 12
Af motor USM USM
Elements 16 16
Weight g 1180.0 615.0 (lighter)
Length mm 132.0 112.8
Diameter mm 108.0 82.6
Min focus m 0.28 0.28
Max magnification 0.16 0.23
Filter mm n/a 77
Stabilized n/a Yes

Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L USM

A rectilinear ultra-wide zoom that goes wider than most full-frame lenses. It has a bulbous front element and no front filter thread.

Pros

  • Extreme 11mm wide end
  • Straight lines, not a fisheye
  • Constant f/4
  • Sharp for the range

Cons

  • No front filter thread
  • Heavy (about 1.2 kg)
  • Bulbous front element is exposed

Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM

A stabilized wide-angle zoom with a constant f/4 aperture. Smaller and lighter than the f/2.8 versions, with a 77mm filter thread.

Pros

  • Image stabilization
  • Sharp across the frame
  • Lighter than the f/2.8
  • 77mm filter thread

Cons

  • f/4 limits astrophotography
  • Less shallow depth of field
  • Not as fast as the f/2.8 versions

More comparisons for Canon EF 11-24mm f/4L USM

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.