Skip to content
Menu

Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM vs Sigma 18-125mm f/3.8-5.6 DC OS HSM

Both are Canon EF lenses. Here is what actually differs.

Pick the Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM if

  • You want a wider view: 16mm vs 18mm at the wide end
  • You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 0.28 m vs 0.35 m
  • You shoot full frame: the Sigma 18-125mm f/3.8-5.6 DC OS HSM is made for APS-C
  • You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 9 aperture blades vs 7
  • Our notes say it suits: Landscape, architecture, handheld travel photography

Pick the Sigma 18-125mm f/3.8-5.6 DC OS HSM if

  • You need more reach: 125mm vs 35mm at the long end
  • You want bigger close-ups: 0.26× vs 0.23× maximum magnification

Spec differences

14 differences
Specifications that differ between the Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM and the Sigma 18-125mm f/3.8-5.6 DC OS HSM
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Sigma 18-125mm f/3.8-5.6 DC OS HSM
Brand
Canon
Sigma
Type
Wide Zoom
Superzoom
Format
Full frame
APS-C
Focal length
16-35mm
18-125mm
Max aperture
f/4
f/3.8
Weight
615 g
not listed
Length
112.8 mm
not listed
Diameter
82.6 mm
not listed
Filter thread
77 mm
67 mm
Min focus distance
0.28 m closer
0.35 m
Max magnification
0.23×
0.26× larger
Aperture blades
9 more blades
7
Autofocus motor
USM
HSM
Released
2014
not listed
3 identical specs hidden: mount, optical design, image stabilization. Show all
Mount
Canon EF both
Optical design
16 elements / 12 groups both
Image stabilization
Yes both

Our notes

Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM

A stabilized wide-angle zoom with a constant f/4 aperture. Smaller and lighter than the f/2.8 versions, with a 77mm filter thread.

Pros

  • Image stabilization
  • Sharp across the frame
  • Lighter than the f/2.8
  • 77mm filter thread

Cons

  • f/4 limits astrophotography
  • Less shallow depth of field
  • Not as fast as the f/2.8 versions

Our notes

Sigma 18-125mm f/3.8-5.6 DC OS HSM

More comparisons

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.