Browse

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM vs Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM is lighter by 280g.
  • Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM reaches further (105mm vs 70mm).
  • Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM is the newer design (2005 vs 2002).
Specification comparison
Spec EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM
Brand Canon Canon
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Superzoom Zoom
Focal length 24-105mm 24-70mm
Max aperture f/24.0 f/24.0
Released 2005 2002
Blades 8 8
Format full-frame full-frame
Groups 13 13
Af motor USM USM
Elements 18 16
Weight g 670.0 (lighter) 950.0
Filter mm 77 77
Length mm 107.0 123.5
Stabilized Yes n/a
Diameter mm 83.5 83.2
Min focus m 0.45 0.38 (closer focusing)
Max magnification 0.23 0.29

Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

A constant-f/4 standard zoom with image stabilization. Canon sold it as a kit lens with several full-frame bodies, and it remains a common general-purpose choice.

Pros

  • Useful 24-105mm range
  • Constant f/4
  • Image stabilization
  • L-series dust and moisture resistance

Cons

  • Noticeable barrel distortion at 24mm
  • Vignetting wide open at the short end
  • Not fast enough for dim light

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

The 2002 original 24-70mm f/2.8L, a bulky standard zoom whose front barrel extends as you zoom. It was replaced by the Mark II in 2012.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8 aperture
  • Sealed L-series construction
  • Fast USM focus
  • Takes 77mm filters

Cons

  • Heavy at around 950g
  • Barrel extends when zooming
  • Softer corners than the Mark II

More comparisons for Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.