Browse

Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM vs Tamron SP AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Macro

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM is lighter by 135g.
  • Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM reaches further (105mm vs 75mm).
Specification comparison
Spec EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM SP AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Macro
Brand Canon Tamron
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Zoom Macro
Focal length 28-105mm 28-75mm
Max aperture f/28.0 f/28.0
Released 2000 n/a
Blades 7 n/a
Format full-frame n/a
Groups 12 n/a
Af motor USM n/a
Elements 15 n/a
Weight g 375.0 (lighter) 510
Filter mm 58 n/a
Length mm 75.0 92.0
Diameter mm 72.0 n/a
Min focus m 0.5 0.33 (closer focusing)
Max magnification 0.19 n/a

Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM

A common general-purpose zoom from around 2000 and a frequent kit lens for film and early digital EOS cameras. It is compact with a 58mm filter thread.

Pros

  • Useful zoom range
  • Light and handy
  • USM focus
  • Takes 58mm filters

Cons

  • Soft wide open
  • Slow variable aperture
  • No stabilization

Tamron SP AF 28-75mm f/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) Macro

A compact f/2.8 standard zoom for full-frame DSLRs, weighing about 510 g. It has a minimum focus distance of 0.33 m and was widely used as an alternative to brand-name lenses.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8
  • Light at about 510 g
  • Close focus 0.33 m
  • Full-frame coverage

Cons

  • Autofocus is slower and louder than newer motors
  • No stabilization
  • Older optical design

More comparisons for Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5 II USM

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.