Skip to content
Menu

Canon EF 90-300mm f/4.5-5.6 vs Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport

Both are Canon EF lenses for full frame. Here is what actually differs.

Pick the Canon EF 90-300mm f/4.5-5.6 if

  • You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 1.5 m vs 2.6 m

Pick the Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport if

  • You want a wider view: 60mm vs 90mm at the wide end
  • You need more reach: 600mm vs 300mm at the long end
  • You shoot handheld in dim light or video: it has optical image stabilization and the Canon EF 90-300mm f/4.5-5.6 does not
  • You want bigger close-ups: 0.3× vs 0.25× maximum magnification
  • You care about the shape of out-of-focus highlights: 9 aperture blades vs 7
  • Our notes say it suits: Wildlife, sports, travel

Spec differences

15 differences
Specifications that differ between the Canon EF 90-300mm f/4.5-5.6 and the Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport
Canon EF 90-300mm f/4.5-5.6 Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport
Brand
Canon
Sigma
Type
Telephoto Zoom
Superzoom
Focal length
90-300mm
60-600mm
Weight
420 g
not listed
Length
114.7 mm
not listed
Diameter
71 mm
not listed
Filter thread
58 mm
105 mm
Min focus distance
1.5 m closer
2.6 m
Max magnification
0.25×
0.3× larger
Aperture blades
7
9 more blades
Optical design
13 elements / 9 groups
25 elements / 19 groups
Autofocus motor
not listed
HSM
Image stabilization
No
Yes stabilized
Weather sealing
not listed
Yes
Released
2003
2018
3 identical specs hidden: mount, format, max aperture. Show all
Mount
Canon EF both
Format
Full frame both
Max aperture
f/4.5 both

Our notes

Canon EF 90-300mm f/4.5-5.6

A 90-300mm f/4.5-5.6 telephoto zoom lens, the Canon EF 90-300mm f/4.5-5.6 is designed for Canon EF mount bodies. The range suits sports, wildlife, events and portraits.

Our notes

Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport

A long telephoto zoom from Sigma's Sport line, with Optical Stabilizer and a dust- and splash-proof structure. It covers 60-600mm.

Pros

  • 60-600mm range
  • Optical Stabilizer
  • Dust- and splash-proof structure

Cons

  • Very heavy at roughly 2.7 kg
  • Large

More comparisons

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.