Browse

Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM vs Canon EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Canon EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM is faster by 1 stop (f/1.4 vs f/2.0), letting in more light.
  • Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM is lighter by 130g.
  • Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM goes wider (22mm vs 32mm).
  • Canon EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM reaches further (32mm vs 22mm).
  • Canon EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM is the newer design (2018 vs 2012).
Specification comparison
Spec EF-M 22mm f/2 STM EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM
Brand Canon Canon
Mount Canon EF-M Canon EF-M
Type Prime Prime
Focal length 22mm (wider) 32mm
Max aperture f/2.0 f/1.4 (faster)
Released 2012 2018
Blades 7 7
Format aps-c aps-c
Groups 6 8
Af motor STM STM
Elements 7 14
Weight g 105.0 (lighter) 235.0
Length mm 23.7 56.5
Diameter mm 60.9 60.9
Min focus m 0.15 (closer focusing) 0.23
Max magnification 0.21 0.25
Filter mm n/a 43

Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM

Pancake prime for Canon's EOS M system, giving about a 35mm field of view on APS-C, introduced in 2012. It weighs 105g and focuses quietly with STM.

Pros

  • Very small and light at 105g
  • f/2 aperture
  • Quiet STM autofocus
  • Close focus of 0.15m

Cons

  • No stabilization
  • Corner softness wide open
  • Focus is by wire

Canon EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM

A 2018 EOS M prime that frames like a 51mm lens on APS-C and has an f/1.4 aperture. It uses a 43mm filter thread and STM autofocus.

Pros

  • f/1.4 aperture
  • Quiet STM focus
  • Compact
  • Close focus of 0.23m

Cons

  • No stabilization
  • EF-M mount only
  • Edges soften wide open

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.