Browse

Canon EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM vs Meike 25mm f/1.8

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Canon EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM is faster by 0.7 stops (f/1.4 vs f/1.8), letting in more light.
  • Meike 25mm f/1.8 goes wider (25mm vs 32mm).
  • Canon EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM reaches further (32mm vs 25mm).
Specification comparison
Spec EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM 25mm f/1.8
Brand Canon Meike
Mount Canon EF-M Canon EF-M
Type Prime Prime
Focal length 32mm 25mm (wider)
Max aperture f/1.4 (faster) f/1.8
Released 2018 n/a
Blades 7 n/a
Format aps-c n/a
Groups 8 5
Af motor STM n/a
Elements 14 7
Weight g 235.0 n/a
Filter mm 43 49
Length mm 56.5 n/a
Diameter mm 60.9 n/a
Min focus m 0.23 (closer focusing) 0.25
Max magnification 0.25 n/a

Canon EF-M 32mm f/1.4 STM

A 2018 EOS M prime that frames like a 51mm lens on APS-C and has an f/1.4 aperture. It uses a 43mm filter thread and STM autofocus.

Pros

  • f/1.4 aperture
  • Quiet STM focus
  • Compact
  • Close focus of 0.23m

Cons

  • No stabilization
  • EF-M mount only
  • Edges soften wide open

Meike 25mm f/1.8

A 25mm f/1.8 APS-C fast wide-angle prime lens, the Meike 25mm f/1.8 is designed for Canon EF-M mount bodies. The wide view suits landscapes, architecture and environmental shots.

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.