Browse

Nikon AF Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8D vs Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Nikon AF Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8D is lighter by 285g.
  • Nikon AF Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8D goes wider (60mm vs 105mm).
  • Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro reaches further (105mm vs 60mm).
Specification comparison
Spec AF Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8D 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro
Brand Nikon Sigma
Mount Nikon F Nikon F
Type Macro Macro
Focal length 60mm (wider) 105mm
Max aperture f/2.8 f/2.8
Released 1989 n/a
Format full-frame full-frame
Groups 7 11
Af motor none HSM
Elements 8 16
Weight g 440.0 (lighter) 725
Filter mm 62 62
Length mm 74.5 126.4
Diameter mm 70.0 78.3
Min focus m 0.219 (closer focusing) 0.312
Max magnification 1.0 1.0
Blades n/a 9
Stabilized n/a Yes

Nikon AF Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8D

A 1989 macro prime that gives 1:1 magnification with a 62mm filter thread. The AF-S Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8G ED replaced it in 2008.

Pros

  • Life-size reproduction
  • Sharp, flat field
  • Compact
  • Takes 62mm filters

Cons

  • Screw-drive autofocus
  • Focus ring turns during AF
  • Short working distance at 1:1

Sigma 105mm f/2.8 EX DG OS HSM Macro

A stabilized 1:1 macro for full-frame DSLRs that works equally well as a portrait lens. It weighs about 725 g and has a 62mm filter size.

Pros

  • True 1:1 magnification
  • Optical stabilization
  • HSM autofocus
  • 62mm filters

Cons

  • Older EX design
  • Heavier than non-stabilized macro lenses

More comparisons for Nikon AF Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8D

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.