Skip to content
Menu

Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN | Contemporary 017 vs Samyang 16mm T2.2 ED AS UMC CS II

Both are Micro Four Thirds prime lenses for APS-C. Here is what actually differs.

Pick the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN | Contemporary 017 if

  • You need 1⅓ stops more light for low light or background blur (f/1.4 vs f/2.2)
  • You want autofocus (Stepping motor): the Samyang 16mm T2.2 ED AS UMC CS II is manual focus only
  • Our notes say it suits: Video, street, low-light

Pick the Samyang 16mm T2.2 ED AS UMC CS II if

  • You shoot close-ups: it focuses down to 0.2 m vs 0.25 m

Spec differences

13 differences
Specifications that differ between the Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN | Contemporary 017 and the Samyang 16mm T2.2 ED AS UMC CS II
Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN | Contemporary 017 Samyang 16mm T2.2 ED AS UMC CS II
Brand
Sigma
Samyang
Max aperture
f/1.4 1⅓ stops faster
f/2.2
Weight
395 g
not listed
Length
91.1 mm
not listed
Diameter
72.2 mm slimmer
83 mm
Filter thread
67 mm
77 mm
Min focus distance
0.25 m
0.2 m closer
Max magnification
0.1×
not listed
Aperture blades
9
not listed
Optical design
16 elements / 13 groups
13 elements / 11 groups
Autofocus motor
Stepping motor
Manual focus
Weather sealing
Yes
not listed
Released
2017
not listed
5 identical specs hidden: mount, type, format, focal length, image stabilization. Show all
Mount
Micro Four Thirds both
Type
Prime both
Format
APS-C both
Focal length
16mm both
Image stabilization
No both

Our notes

Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN | Contemporary 017

Fast wide prime for Micro Four Thirds, giving about 32mm equivalent with an f/1.4 aperture. It weighs about 395 g.

Pros

  • f/1.4 aperture
  • Sharp
  • Close focus to 0.25 m

Cons

  • Large for a Micro Four Thirds prime
  • No stabilization

Our notes

Samyang 16mm T2.2 ED AS UMC CS II

More comparisons

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.