Browse

Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z vs Tamron 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 B061 RF

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z is faster by 0.6 stops (f/2.8 vs f/3.5), letting in more light.
  • Tamron 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 B061 RF goes wider (18mm vs 70mm).
  • Tamron 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 B061 RF reaches further (300mm vs 200mm).
Specification comparison
Spec RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 B061 RF
Brand Canon Tamron
Mount Canon RF Canon RF
Type Telephoto Zoom Superzoom
Focal length 70-200mm 18-300mm (wider)
Max aperture f/2.8 (faster) f/3.5
Released 2024 n/a
Blades 11 n/a
Format full-frame n/a
Groups 15 n/a
Af motor USM n/a
Elements 18 n/a
Weight g 1115.0 n/a
Filter mm 82 n/a
Length mm 199.0 n/a
Stabilized Yes n/a
Diameter mm 88.5 n/a
Min focus m 0.49 n/a
Max magnification 0.2 n/a

Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z

Revision of the RF 70-200mm f/2.8 with video-oriented features and image stabilization, introduced in 2024. At about 1.1kg it is lighter than the EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III.

Pros

  • Constant f/2.8
  • Image stabilization
  • Takes RF extenders
  • Sealed construction

Cons

  • Large
  • Heavy for travel at about 1.1kg

Tamron 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 B061 RF

Tamron 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 B061 RF: a superzoom lens with a 18-300mm focal length and a maximum aperture of f/3.5-6.3, made for Canon RF mount cameras. The wide-to-tele range makes it a one-lens option for travel and everyday shooting.

More comparisons for Canon RF 70-200mm F2.8 L IS USM Z

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.