Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon vs Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 R WR
Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.
Verdict at a glance
- Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 R WR is faster by 1 stop (f/2.0 vs f/2.8), letting in more light.
- Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 R WR is lighter by 485g.
- Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon goes wider (16mm vs 35mm).
- Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon reaches further (55mm vs 35mm).
| Spec | XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon | XF 35mm F2 R WR |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fujifilm | Fujifilm |
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X |
| Type | Zoom | Prime |
| Focal length | 16-55mm (wider) | 35mm |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/2.0 (faster) |
| Format | aps-c | aps-c |
| Af motor | Linear motor | n/a |
| Weight g | 655 | 170 (lighter) |
| Filter mm | 77 | 43 |
| Length mm | 106.0 | 46.0 |
| Diameter mm | 83.0 | 60.0 |
| Min focus m | 0.3 (closer focusing) | 0.35 |
| Weather sealed | Yes | Yes |
Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon
The main pro standard zoom for Fujifilm X, constant f/2.8 across about 24-82mm equivalent. It has weather sealing and no stabilization.
Pros
- Constant f/2.8
- Weather-resistant
- Sharp
Cons
- Heavy at about 655 g
- No stabilization in the lens
Fujifilm XF 35mm F2 R WR
A compact, weather-resistant 35mm f/2 prime for Fujifilm X, giving roughly 52mm equivalent. It focuses faster and quieter than the f/1.4.
Pros
- Small and light at about 170 g
- Weather-resistant
- Fast, quiet autofocus
Cons
- f/2 gives less background blur than the f/1.4
- Less light than the f/1.4 R in dim scenes
More comparisons for Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon
- Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon vs Sigma 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS | Contemporary 025
- Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon vs Tamron 17–70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
- Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon vs Tamron 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD
- Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon vs Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC