Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon vs Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC
Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.
Sigma
17-40mm f/1.8 DC
Verdict at a glance
- Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC is faster by 1.3 stops (f/1.8 vs f/2.8), letting in more light.
- Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon goes wider (16mm vs 17mm).
- Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon reaches further (55mm vs 40mm).
| Spec | XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon | 17-40mm f/1.8 DC |
|---|---|---|
| Brand | Fujifilm | Sigma |
| Mount | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X |
| Type | Zoom | Zoom |
| Focal length | 16-55mm (wider) | 17-40mm |
| Max aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.8 (faster) |
| Format | aps-c | aps-c |
| Af motor | Linear motor | n/a |
| Weight g | 655 | n/a |
| Filter mm | 77 | n/a |
| Length mm | 106.0 | n/a |
| Diameter mm | 83.0 | n/a |
| Min focus m | 0.3 | 0.28 (closer focusing) |
| Weather sealed | Yes | n/a |
| Blades | n/a | 11 |
| Groups | n/a | 11 |
| Elements | n/a | 17 |
| Max magnification | n/a | 0.21 |
Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon
The main pro standard zoom for Fujifilm X, constant f/2.8 across about 24-82mm equivalent. It has weather sealing and no stabilization.
Pros
- Constant f/2.8
- Weather-resistant
- Sharp
Cons
- Heavy at about 655 g
- No stabilization in the lens
Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC
This 17-40mm f/1.8 APS-C fast wide-angle zoom lens from Sigma fits Fujifilm X mount cameras. It covers wide angles for landscapes, interiors and architecture.
More comparisons for Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon
- Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon vs Sigma 16-300mm F3.5-6.7 DC OS | Contemporary 025
- Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon vs Tamron 17–70mm F2.8 Di III-A VC RXD
- Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon vs Tamron 18-300mm F3.5-6.3 Di III-A VC VXD
- Fujifilm XF 16-55mm F2.8 R LM WR Fujinon vs Sigma 17-40mm f/1.8 DC