Browse

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III vs Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III is faster by 0.3 stops (f/4.0 vs f/4.5), letting in more light.
  • Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport goes wider (60mm vs 75mm).
  • Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport reaches further (600mm vs 300mm).
Specification comparison
Spec EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport
Brand Canon Sigma
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Telephoto Zoom Superzoom
Focal length 75-300mm 60-600mm (wider)
Max aperture f/4.0 (faster) f/4.5
Released 1999 n/a
Blades 7 n/a
Format full-frame n/a
Groups 9 n/a
Elements 13 n/a
Weight g 480.0 n/a
Filter mm 58 n/a
Length mm 122.1 n/a
Diameter mm 71.0 n/a
Min focus m 1.5 n/a
Max magnification 0.25 n/a

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III

An entry-level telephoto zoom with no stabilization and a basic micro motor instead of USM. Covers full frame.

Pros

  • Light
  • Long reach
  • Simple to use

Cons

  • No image stabilization
  • Soft at 300mm
  • Slow, noisy AF

Sigma 60-600mm f/4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM Sport

A long telephoto zoom from Sigma's Sport line, with Optical Stabilizer and a dust- and splash-proof structure. It covers 60-600mm.

Pros

  • 60-600mm range
  • Optical Stabilizer
  • Dust- and splash-proof structure

Cons

  • Very heavy at roughly 2.7 kg
  • Large

More comparisons for Canon EF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.