Browse

Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM vs Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM is lighter by 2530g.
  • Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM is the newer design (2018 vs 1999).
Specification comparison
Spec EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM
Brand Canon Canon
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Telephoto Telephoto
Focal length 400mm 400mm
Max aperture f/2.8 f/2.8
Released 2018 1999
Blades 9 8
Format full-frame full-frame
Groups 13 13
Af motor USM USM
Elements 17 17
Weight g 2840.0 (lighter) 5370.0
Length mm 343.0 349.0
Stabilized Yes Yes
Diameter mm 163.0 163.0
Min focus m 2.5 (closer focusing) 3.0
Max magnification 0.17 0.15

Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM

The third generation of Canon's 400mm f/2.8 supertelephoto, redesigned to be much lighter than the II. Image stabilization and fluorite elements.

Pros

  • About a kilogram lighter than the II
  • f/2.8 aperture
  • Stabilized
  • Fast AF

Cons

  • Still heavy at about 2.8 kg
  • Demands a monopod
  • Large

Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS USM

The 1999 first stabilized version of Canon's 400mm f/2.8, a staple for pro sports and wildlife shooters. Later II and III models reduced the weight.

Pros

  • f/2.8 aperture with IS
  • Weather-sealed L build
  • Fast USM focusing
  • Takes Canon extenders

Cons

  • About 5.4kg
  • Older IS generation
  • Heavier than the II and III

More comparisons for Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.