Browse

Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art vs Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM

Side-by-side comparison from our catalogue data. Better values are highlighted only where a clear difference exists.

Verdict at a glance

  • Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art is faster by 9.3 stops (f/1.4 vs f/35.0), letting in more light.
  • Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM is lighter by 330g.
Specification comparison
Spec 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art EF 35mm f/2 IS USM
Brand Sigma Canon
Mount Canon EF Canon EF
Type Prime Prime
Focal length 35mm 35mm
Max aperture f/1.4 (faster) f/35.0
Released n/a 2012
Blades 9 8
Format full-frame full-frame
Groups 11 8
Af motor HSM USM
Elements 13 10
Weight g 665 335.0 (lighter)
Filter mm 67 67
Length mm 94.0 62.6
Diameter mm 77.0 77.9
Min focus m 0.3 0.24 (closer focusing)
Max magnification 0.19 0.24
Stabilized n/a Yes

Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art

The lens that launched Sigma's Art line, a 35mm f/1.4 prime with a hypersonic motor. It weighs about 665 g.

Pros

  • Sharp from wide open
  • HSM autofocus
  • Solid build

Cons

  • Large for a 35mm
  • Autofocus tuning may be needed on some bodies

Canon EF 35mm f/2 IS USM

The EF 35mm f/2 IS USM is a compact wide-normal prime with a hybrid image stabilizer and f/2 aperture. Covers full frame and works on APS-C Canon EF bodies.

Pros

  • Image stabilization
  • Small and light
  • Close minimum focus distance (0.24 m)
  • Quick ring USM focus

Cons

  • f/2 is slower than the f/1.4L
  • Not an L-series build
  • Less background blur than f/1.4

More comparisons for Sigma 35mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art

Compare other lenses or browse our best-of guides.