Laowa 10mm f/2 Zero-D MFT vs Meike 10mm f/2
Both are Micro Four Thirds prime lenses. Here is what actually differs.
Pick the Laowa 10mm f/2 Zero-D MFT if
- You want the lighter lens to carry: 425 g lighter (125 g vs 550 g)
- Our notes say it suits: Astrophotography on MFT, interiors, video
Pick the Meike 10mm f/2 if
Our spec data shows no clear advantage for this lens.
Spec differences
7 differences| Laowa 10mm f/2 Zero-D MFT | Meike 10mm f/2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
Laowa
|
Meike
|
| Weight |
125 g
lighter
|
550 g
|
| Filter thread |
46 mm
|
not listed
|
| Min focus distance |
0.12 m
|
not listed
|
| Max magnification |
0.15×
|
not listed
|
| Aperture blades |
5
|
not listed
|
| Optical design |
11 elements / 7 groups
|
15 elements / 12 groups
|
6 identical specs hidden: mount, type, focal length, max aperture, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Micro Four Thirds both
- Type
- Prime both
- Focal length
- 10mm both
- Max aperture
- f/2 both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
Our notes
Laowa 10mm f/2 Zero-D MFT
A fast manual-focus 10mm f/2 for Micro Four Thirds that is designed to have minimal distortion. It has a 46mm filter thread and focuses as close as 0.12 m.
Pros
- f/2
- Low distortion
- Close focus 0.12 m
- Compact
Cons
- Manual focus only
- 5-bladed aperture
- Not weather sealed
Our notes
Meike 10mm f/2
More comparisons
Laowa 10mm f/2 Zero-D MFT vs Samyang 10mm f/2.8 ED AS NCS CS
Laowa 10mm f/2 Zero-D MFT: 1 stop faster, 495 g lighter
Samyang 10mm f/2.8 ED AS NCS CS vs Meike 10mm f/2
Meike 10mm f/2: 1 stop faster, 70 g lighter
Venus Laowa C&D-Dreamer MFT 10mm F2.0 vs Laowa 10mm f/2 Zero-D MFT
Laowa 10mm f/2 Zero-D MFT: astrophotography on MFT
Venus Laowa C&D-Dreamer MFT 10mm F2.0 vs Meike 10mm f/2
Venus Laowa C&D-Dreamer MFT 10mm F2.0: 425 g lighter
Laowa 10mm f/2 Zero-D MFT vs TTArtisan 10mm f/2
focuses closer vs more blades