Meike 10mm f/2 vs TTArtisan 10mm f/2
Both are Micro Four Thirds prime lenses. Here is what actually differs.
Spec differences
6 differences| Meike 10mm f/2 | TTArtisan 10mm f/2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Brand |
Meike
|
TTArtisan
|
| Weight |
550 g
|
not listed
|
| Filter thread |
not listed
|
72 mm
|
| Min focus distance |
not listed
|
0.25 m
|
| Aperture blades |
not listed
|
8
|
| Optical design |
15 elements / 12 groups
|
13 elements / 10 groups
|
6 identical specs hidden: mount, type, focal length, max aperture, autofocus motor, image stabilization. Show all
- Mount
- Micro Four Thirds both
- Type
- Prime both
- Focal length
- 10mm both
- Max aperture
- f/2 both
- Autofocus motor
- Manual focus both
- Image stabilization
- No both
More comparisons
Samyang 10mm f/2.8 ED AS NCS CS vs Meike 10mm f/2
Meike 10mm f/2: 1 stop faster, 70 g lighter
Samyang 10mm f/2.8 ED AS NCS CS vs TTArtisan 10mm f/2
TTArtisan 10mm f/2: 1 stop faster
Venus Laowa C&D-Dreamer MFT 10mm F2.0 vs Meike 10mm f/2
Venus Laowa C&D-Dreamer MFT 10mm F2.0: 425 g lighter
Venus Laowa C&D-Dreamer MFT 10mm F2.0 vs TTArtisan 10mm f/2
focuses closer vs more blades
Laowa 10mm f/2 Zero-D MFT vs Meike 10mm f/2
Laowa 10mm f/2 Zero-D MFT: 425 g lighter, astrophotography on MFT
Laowa 10mm f/2 Zero-D MFT vs TTArtisan 10mm f/2
focuses closer vs more blades